Quantum of Solace’s political point of view

Four years after it was released, Quantum of Solace can still stir up debate among 007 fans. One topic is whether the 22nd James Bond film had a political point of view. Director Marc Forster, in a November 2008 interivew with New York magazine, said it did.

Marc Forster while directing Quantum of Solace

Some excerpts:

“It’s like I worked under this political regime with extreme censorship,” Forster plainly admits, describing his arrangement with Bond’s producers, the infamously controlling Broccoli family. “I had to subversively inject my ideas to make the movie my own.”
“I question the role that these Secret Service agencies play today—is their role really to protect the country? Or the interest of a few?”
Most radical, Forster argues that “Bond isn’t a clear good guy—the villain and Bond overlap.” In fact, the director—never a Bond fanatic—is surprised that 007 has survived this long, “especially as a colonialist or imperialistic character. That’s why you have to put a dent in him, because those powers can’t survive. It’s the end of the American world power in the next few decades.”

Maybe the article was read by a lot of 007 fans at the time (we admit to missing it), but it doesn’t seem to be cited that often in all the message board debates. Anyway, to read the entire article, JUST CLICK HERE.

4 Responses

  1. The villain in QoS is an environmentalist. This alone makes it one of my favorite Bond films.

  2. Here’s what Forster had to say about the environmentalist theme in the New York magazine article:

    “Chevron is green now, Shell is green,” he says. “These big oil conglomerates all say, Green sells—let’s make money out of it.”

  3. Dominic Green is walking greenwash – a fake environmentalist out to make profit off selling a natural resource (water) that should be free. He represents all the multinational corporations who are trying to do this in real life, who are attempting to privatize resources that should belong to everyone. Quantum’s theme could be ripped from a Naomi Klein book. This aspect is what makes the film far more interesting than many other Bonds.

  4. […] also had a more political point of view courtesy of director Marc […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: