As Jack Benny used to say, “Well!”
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Warner Bros. answer to Marvel Studios’ extended superhero franchise opens Friday. It’s not going over well with critics — at all. The movie has a 37 percent “fresh” rating on the Rotten Tomatoes website (as of 6 p.m. Wedneday, New York time) that collects reviews.
But it’s not just the low rating. Critics who’ve attended advance showings apparently have been inspired to rip the film with Ben Affleck as Batman and Henry Cavill as Superman.
So, here’s a non-spoiler sampling of the pans along with some praise.
A.O. SCOTT, THE NEW YORK TIMES: ” Intellectual pretension, long an occupational hazard in the superhero business, has been elevated to a creative principle. …(Director Zack) Snyder, for his part, deploys signifiers of importance without having anything much to say.”
SOREN ANDERSEN, THE SEATTLE TIMES: “The powers that be at Warner gave director Zack Snyder (“Man of Steel,” “300”) a budget of $250 million, according to published reports, and what he has given in return is a movie that treats the audience as an enemy, a victim.”
LAWRENCE TOPPMAN, THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER: “The score by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL reaches the decibel level of a departing 767, the fireballs quadruple in size and frequency…And the story, like the testicles of a weightlifter on steroids, dwindles away to nothing.”
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Rotten Tomatoes Web site, Zack Snyder |
I hated “Man of Steel”.
Intrigued by Nicholas Barber’s review: ‘here we have the Batman fans have been waiting for.’ But Superman and Wonder Woman are just superfluous, and that if it was just Batman and Eisenberg as the Joker, it would have been the ultimate Batman film. Wow. I almost can’t wait.