The 007 film dilemma in 3 minutes

Image for the official James Bond feed on Twitter

Image for the official James Bond feed on Twitter

As the James Bond film franchise decides what to do next, it faces a bit of a dilemma:

Should it continue to seek more critical respect (Casino Royale and Skyfall) or should it embrace its roots, the way SPECTRE, the most recent 007 film, did?

The last two Bond films were directed by an auteur, Sam Mendes.

In 2012, Eon Productions co-boss Barbara Broccoli told ComingSoon.Net that the franchise didn’t hire journeymen directors: “(W)e’ve never been one to hire directors for hire. We always wanted someone who was a great director in their own right and a storyteller.”

Yet, in the first four movies of the series — which generated some of the most memorable scenes for the franchise — were directed by journeymen Terence Young and Guy Hamilton. Young, in particular, dealt with cost and schedule overruns on Dr. No and From Russia With Love.

Young even had part of his Dr. No fee impounded until costs were recouped at the box office because of the overruns. Bond was a much more modest undertaking in those days.

2012 also saw something that summarizes the divide between respect and tradition.

The British Academy of Film and Television Arts wanted to celebrate the 50th anniversayr of the Bond films. So Tom Jones appeared to perform the title song to Thunderball, the fourth 007 film.

The audiences was full of artistes. Yet they seemed to be having as good a time as audiences did in 1965 when Thunderball first came out.

On some occasions, respect and tradition can coincide. Something to keep in mind as Bond 25 undergoes its journey in development. Here’s Sir Tom in 2012:

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. What about Alex O’Laughlin as a new Bond? Me and a lot of other people think he would be perfect. Let us know your thoughts!

  2. Should it continue to seek more critical respect (Casino Royale and Skyfall) or should it embrace its roots, the way SPECTRE, the most recent 007 film, did?

    “Skyfall” tried to embrace critical respect? “Skyfall” . .. which couldn’t make up its mind on whether it was a serious drama or a rehash of most of the cartoonish Bond movies from the 60s and 70s?

  3. I wish they’d look at the first 4 Connery films and try to make all Bond films like them.

  4. Ha ha and Double-Hah (the next Craig ‘Bond’ can use that title) … ‘critical respect’ — the Craig Bonds are just Bourne knock-offs, instead of having the uniqueness of its own brand. (Although, yes, Bond has kept in touch with the current fad, but it never lost its core identity.) I haven’t even seen the latest ‘Bond’ … but was recently informed that there is a scene where ‘Bond’ gets his head drilled and he suffers no affects, ill or otherwise. And this is supposed to be the ‘gritty, real Bond.’ Give me Brosnan, Connery, Moore, Lazenby, even dour Dalton (next to Craig Dalton looks like party animal), give me Bond classic, not ‘new, improved 002.5.’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: