
It turns out that Henry Cavill isn’t playing Superman anymore. The actor has quit The Witcher streaming show on Netflix. So does Cavill re-enter the picture to play James Bond in Bond 26?
Naturally, the blog has questions.
Is Cavill back in the picture?
I wouldn’t go banco on that.
Much has been made how Cavill, now 39, was in contention to play Bond for Casino Royale back when he was in his early 20s.
However, we know that Eon boss Barbara Broccoli was always keen on Daniel Craig playing Bond. While there were screen tests of other actors (including Cavill), they were stalking horses to show Sony/Columbia (which would release Casino Royale) that it wasn’t a one-horse race. Except, it was a one-horse race from almost the beginning.
What about the Pierce Brosnan precedent? Eon *had* signed Brosnan in the 1980s to play Bond. But the actor’s ties to the Remington Steele TV show got in the way when NBC renewed the series at the last minute. Eon would bring Brosnan back to play Bond for GoldenEye (1995).
Eon *has never* shown that level of commitment to Cavill.
Are you skeptical that Cavill had a chance this time?
Yes.
A few years ago, the conventional wisdom was Eon wouldn’t go back to Cavill because he had played Superman and appeared in spy movies (The Man From U.N.C.L.E. in 2015 and Mission: Impossible Fallout in 2018).
Now, it could be updated by saying Cavill is damaged goods by Warner Bros. rejecting him participating in future Superman movies. And don’t forget The Man From U.N.C.L.E. movie had modest box office.
Lately, Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson of Eon have talked about how a future Bond actor should be younger. Then again, Daniel Craig was 37 when cast and his first Bond movie came out when he was 38.
As usual, we’ll see.
Filed under: Comic book movies, James Bond Films | Tagged: Barbara Broccoli, Bond 26, Casino Royale, Daniel Craig, Eon Productions, Henry Cavill, Michael G. Wilson, Pierce Brosnan, Remington Steele |
Leave a Reply