Recently, I’ve seen some posts on social media bringing up the issue of who is a “true” James Bond fan.
I suspect the recent posts were spurred by the poll of Americans last month performed by Morning Consult on behalf of The Hollywood Reporter. It dealt with opinions about 007 films.
Some Bond fans complained, saying only people who are knowledgeable about 007 should be polled.
The Morning Consult poll appeared to be trying to come up with a statistically representative sampling of Americans. In that regard, it was similar to a political poll. Such polls talk to everyone from hard-core political junkies, to those who couldn’t spell “president” and everything in between.
Anyway, if you were to do a poll of “true” James Bond fans, how do you define that?
Should only those who’ve seen every Eon Productions 007 movies be considered? If so, how many times? Five? 10? 15? More?
How about only those who’ve seen the Eon series plus the two non-Eon 007 films? All of the above plus the 1954 CBS adaptation of Casino Royale?
How about all of the above plus those who’ve read the Ian Fleming original novels and short stories? Or should the continuation novels and short stories also be part of the definition?
I brought this up on Twitter this week and got a lot of feedback. Some of it, I suspect was tongue in cheek. Some of it, maybe not.
Regardless, this isn’t the first time the subject will come up. It’s unlikely to be the last.
However, the more germane issue is how James Bond — despite many interpretations over the decades — still is popular with the general population, not just hard-core fans.
In that regard, he’s similar to Batman, a character who has been around even longer. (Batman debuted in 1939 compared with Bond’s arrival in 1953.) You’ve had the Dark Knight. You’ve the Bright Knight. And everything in between.
That kind of longevity should be something that 007 fans — “true” fans or casual fans — ought to be able to celebrate in unison.
Filed under: James Bond Books, James Bond Films | Tagged: 1954 Casino Royale, Batman, Morning Consult, The Hollywood Reporter | 6 Comments »