Let’s start with The New York Times’s A.O. Scott. He finds it a mixed bag including a “conceptually clever and visually grating” main title, and one action scene involving boats that “brings back painful memories of the invisible car that Pierce Brosnan tooled around in a few movies ago.” On the plus side, he says the locales have a “nice touristic effect.” And he says villain Dominic Greene is “one of the best in a while.”
To read Scott’s review, click HERE.
Then, there’s Joe Morgenstern in The Wall Street Journal. To say he didn’t like it is an understatement. First of all, he only devoted one paragraph (deciding to concentrate on reviewing Slumdog Millionaire). He says the film has “clumsy direction of a heartless script.”
To read Morgenstern’s (mini) review, click HERE and scroll down to the second review.
Separately, The Journal did a story about the literary Bond and how he’s different that the movie Bond. Click HERE to check it out.
Over at The Detroit News, count critic Tom Long as disappointng, only giving the film a grade of C. “’Quantum of Solace,’ the gritty, grim, stunt-stuffed 007 film that functions as a direct sequel to ‘Casino Royale,’ is certainly an action film,” Long writes. “But anyone who’s followed the franchise for more than a decade may walk away wondering, is it a Bond film?”
To take in the rest of the review, click HERE. `
Filed under: James Bond Books, James Bond Films | Tagged: Daniel Craig, James Bond, James Bond Books, James Bond Films, QOS review, Quantum of Solace, The Detroit News, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal | Leave a comment »